Wii Sports Resort: Motion Plus Demo
Craig Harris shows you the accuracy of Wii Motion Plus.
Duration : 0:1:40
Craig Harris shows you the accuracy of Wii Motion Plus.
Duration : 0:1:40
http://www.sbrforum.com – SBR.tvs Peter Loshak and industry vet Big Al McMordie continue their preview of Week 12 in the NFL after their successful Thanksgiving Day analysis.
Cleveland scored 37 points last week, a major jump in production for their normally anemic offense. But Cincinnati will no doubt give a better effort on D than Detroit gave the Browns last week. Al liked the over the first time these two teams met this year, as well as the over in the Cleveland/Detroit game last week. But this week its a different situation, and he and Loshak discuss the merits or lack thereof of a play on the over 38.5.
St Louis has hosted some of the top offenses in the NFL at home this year, which has led to a run of overs on their home games. With Seattle coming to town this week, things might be a bit different. The Seahawks arent generating any kind of run game at all, and Loshak and Al discuss whether the total of 42.5 is a bit too high.
The Jets are a 3-point home fave over Carolina in a clash of teams that have had mirror image seasons ATS-wise. The Jets are 1-6 ATS in their last 7 after a hot ATS start, while the Panthers are 4-2 ATS in their last 6 after a slew of ATS losses to start the year. The Panthers have a number of weaknesses that have some wondering if this might be a week to try to time an ATS cover by the Jets. The Jets being the Jets have others wondering if this might be another good week to bet against the Jets.
Indianapolis is a 3.5-point road fave at Houston despite only beating the Texans by 3 at home a few weeks ago, and Al thinks this might be the week when the undefeated Colts are dealt their first loss. The Colts are only 1-2-1 ATS over their last 4 games, which were all SU wins but also all close down to the wire. Even if the Colts stay undefeated, if this game is again close down to the wire, Houston getting a FG and a hook will loom large.
For sportsbook reviews and information visit:
http://www.sportsbookreview.com
For the offshore industry’s premier free up-to-the-minute sports betting odds service go to:
http://www.sbrodds.com
For more sports betting videos visit:
http://www.sbr.tv
Duration : 0:7:9
Präsentiert von http://www.nixsms.net/fresh
Jeden Tag kostenlos SMS verschicken
mal eine etwas andere Version von “Bet on it” aus dem Film ” Higschool Musical 2 ”
Viel Spaß
Duration : 0:3:57
List 3 safe sports and 3 dangerous sports ( or more if you want too ! )
Obviously all sports carry a risk, but some are more dangerous then others. For example, rugby is a lot more dangerous then ballroom dancing.
Football, Boxing, Bull-fighting, are all dangerous.
Swimming, Golf, Pitching shoes, are all not so dangerous.
I could understand college football being more strict than the NFL, but hey, aren’t these games a big show. It seems like now players cant even celebrate; We all love to see endzone celebrations, just some can be a bit silly and just plain stupid i.e. (a few years back Joe Horn with the flip cell phone- in the endzone) but for the most part they are all very good. But whats your opinions are the regulations two strict?? And whats your favorite celebration?
yes very much so after what they did to jake locker was just wrong byu should have lost that game.
I’m not a novice I know the basics exactas, win, place and show. But I want more information which books will give me all I need to know to picking the winners. What is the bible to horse betting?
Picking Winners is OK, but biased towards speed figures.
I would go with "Betting Thouroughbreds" by Steven Davidowitz as a good all around source for someone looking for more than just the basics.
Looking for sportsbook contests with no or small minimum deposit
This football season there will be a free contest at http://www.Sportsbook-Ratings.net ! The ‘Free Sports Picks’ section will have a weekly handicapping contest for NFL football picks…the winner will take away cold cash!
In horse racing, how many different types of surfaces are there? I know dirt and turf are traditional, with different grades of each, but now there polytrack, pro-ride, and who know what else? Is there evidence that the man-made surfaces are safer? Which types of horses do best on what surface? Clearly, my question(s) are broad in nature, I’d like to learn more about each.
Each different company that manufactures and installs synthetic surfaces has their own proprietary materials and installation process. They are all reluctant to disclose materials, but in general they take sand particles and coat them with a polymer of some kind– I’ve heard it characterized as a "wax." This website will tell you more than you ever wanted to know about what a "wax" is: http://www.lipidlibrary.co.uk/Lipids/waxes/index.htm
To the coated sand particles, the companies each have a witch’s brew of shredded insulative material, again some kind of synthetic polymer, and other materials from various sources. They mix all this stuff together in some sort of formulaic ratio, and then install it over a surface of asphalt or other firm base material.
Truth is, every single synthetic track surface in the United States right now is at best a "beta test" site for the manufacturer. As Santa Anita found out the hard way, the performance of the track surfaces under real world conditions of temperature variations, rain, various watering schedules, different conditions of relative humidity, and the wear-and-tear of over 1000 horses training and racing over it every day, is far from well-characterized. Santa Anita had to have the first synthetic surface they installed completely removed because of drainage problems (among other things). The second surface they installed encountered unforeseen compaction problems at the beginning of the race meet, when we had some untypical weather conditions out here and the track maintenance crew didn’t know how to deal with the situation– and neither did the manufacturer.
The California Horse Racing Board, which mandated the installation of synthetic surfaces at California racetracks, has been watching the situation closely. The early reports have indicated a reduction in catastrophic injuries during races/training over the course of the meetings, and some indications from vets and trainers that fewer horses are suffering non-catastrophic injuries (i.e., non-displaced fractures and chips and such).
I think the jury is still out on some of the questions you’re asking. The question of which horses do best on what surfaces is something that breeders, especially, would really like to know, because it might make a HUGE difference in the value of a horse as a stallion. The current wisdom is that horses that do well on turf will do well on synthetic surfaces, but I don’t know if there’s enough statistical information to support that.
Everything relating to synthetic track surfaces is in its infancy right now, and very much evolving. The upkeep and maintenance of synthetic tracks is in a "making it up as we go along" state right now, with the manufacturers of the surfaces working closely with track superintendents to develop daily maintenance and monitoring procedures to assure safety and consistency.
Give it another five years or so, and I think there will be answers to your questions that are backed up by good data. Right now it’s too early to tell.